In this paper, I question the notion that "The Visual" is a culturally transparent means of communication. I will be demonstrating how different cultures (Japan and Britain) use the resources of visual communication in ways that relate to their specific underlying value systems. In order to show this I draw on advertisements from both countries and use the visual grammar developed by Kress and Van Leeuven (1996). By analysing the forms that the advertisements take: the semiotic structure of the images, rather than their content, it is possible to find differences that relate to the specific cultural locations of theadvertisements. [sic! ///Hans] I hope that by doing this, it becomes clear how all the representations of a culture are dependent on that culture and that inter-cultural communication is tied to deep-seated values rather than free floating.
keywords: Culturally conditioned visual communication, visual grammar, underlying value systems, spatial semiotic systems.
1 The purpose of this paper.
In this paper, I question the notion that "The Visual" is a culturally transparent means of communication (Neurath, 1937, 1948). I will be demonstrating how different cultures (Japanese and British) use the resources of visual communication, in ways that are related to their specific underlying value systems. In order to show this I draw on advertisements from both countries and use the visual grammar developed by Kress and van Leeuwen (1990, 1996).
By analysing the forms (visual syntax) that the advertisements take: the semiotic structure of the images, with less emphasis on their content (visual lexis), it is possible to find systematic differences that relate to the specific locations of the advertisements in a given social cultural context.
I hope that by doing this, it becomes clear how visual representations are dependent on a specific culture and that intercultural communication can be deeply conditioned by the degree of understanding of visual semiotics as a cultural code.
2 Theoretical framework and descriptive categories for the discussion of data
I will discuss my data with reference to Halliday’s (1978, 1985) notion of three metafunctions in human communication, which are later applied by Kress and van Leeuwen (1990, 1996) for the analysis of visual images. They are (quote from Kress and van Leeuwen 1996):
1) The Ideational metafunction
the ability of semiotic systems to represent objects and their relations in a
world outside the representational system or in the semiotic system of
2) The Interpersonal metafunction
the ability of semiotic system to project the relations between the producer of
that sign or complex sign, and the receiver/reproducer of that sign, that is to
project a particular social relation between the producer, the viewer and the
object represented (Ibid:41).
3) The Textual metafunction
the ability of the semiotic system to form texts, where complexes of signs
cohere both internally and with the context in and for which they were
produced and different Compositional arrangements which allow the
realization of different textual meanings (Ibid:41).
As one realisation of the Ideational metafunction, I will draw attention to the directionality that visual images create or embody within them: what I call visual directionality.
With respect to the Textual metafunction, I will examine the way in which visual space is used in terms of distribution of meaning. In other words, I will focus on what visual elements appear in what part of visual space with what kind of meaning.
Figure 1 Use of space and information values (from Kress and van Leeuwen 1996:208)
In this paper, I will deal with one type of textual composition: Left/Right. This category will be used to explore value distribution in each spatial domain: which represented participant with what kind of meaning appears in which part of visual space in advertising texts. With its starting point in the framework by Kress and van Leeuwen (1996), which deals exclusively with Western visual representations, I will examine how far their framework can be applied and consider the cultural specificness of the distribution of values in spatial dimensions. (Figure 1)
The textual composition of Left and Right will be considered, first of all, based on the proposition in Kress and van Leeuwen (1996), in relation to the structure of information value in English speech, ‘Given’ and ‘New’. ‘Given’, in English speech, marks a point of departure of certain propositions, which is followed by ‘New’ information, which forms the nucleus part of the message. ‘Given’ is something already known and ‘New’ is something to be found out, something ‘at issue’. Kress and van Leeuwen propose that, according to Western visual semiotic, the meaning of ‘Given’ and ‘New’ are distributed in the visual domain of Left and Right, respectively.
I will also draw attention to the way in which visual representations construct the relationship between what is depicted in the text and the viewer: social interactions, by looking at (and applying) formal structures in visual images. I will explore to what extent the choice and use of specific formal structure creates a particular type of interaction between represented participants and the viewer.
Interactive Social Distance Social
Attitude Angles Detachment
Figure 2 The systems of interactive meanings (based on Kress and van Leeuwen 1996:154)
Finally, I will outline descriptive categories, by which represented participants manifest a relationship with interactive participants (the viewer). I will call these categories interactive markers (originally proposed by Kress and van Leeuwen 1996): They are Contact, Social Distance and Attitude. (Figure 2)
The system of Contact
It is possible for represented participants to involve the viewer in a certain (imaginary) action: This is termed as an "image act" (Kress and van Leeuwen 1996). An Image act can be realised by a certain action, with which a represented participant is depicted. For example, an image of a woman who is holding a glass of wine towards the viewer, smiling, can be said to engage in an image act, in that she is represented to be inviting the viewer to take part in the action: accepting the glass of wine. As one of the formal categories which provides the medium through which represented participants can interact with the viewer, there is eye contact between the two parties. This is Contact.
Contact has two kinds of realisations: Demand and Offer. The former interactive meaning is realised when a represented participant has eye contact with the viewer; such as a represented participant looking at or smiling at the viewer. The latter type of interaction is realised when a represented participant has no direct eye contact with the viewer and the represented participant presents him/her/itself to be ‘looked at’ by the viewer, that is, "it ‘offers’ the represented participants to the viewer as items of information, objects of contemplation, impersonally, as though they were specimens in a display case" (Ibid:124).
The system of Social Distance
The ‘distance’ between represented participants and the viewer also indicates the relationship between them. This forms the system of Social Distance: Intimate/Personal, Social and Impersonal. Represented participants who/which are depicted with Personal distance can allow the viewer to be positioned relatively closer to them, than the ones with Social distance. Hall (1964) calls them "Silent assumptions in social communication" in Disorders of communication 42:41-55 (Kress and van Leeuwen 1996:131):
Intimate distance ------ the head and face only
Close personal distance ------ the head and shoulders
Far personal distance ------- from the waist up
Close social distance ------ the whole figure
Far social distance ------ the whole figure with space around it
Public distance ------ the torso of at least four or five people
The manipulation of Social Distance is a realisation of the Interpersonal relationship between the represented participants and the ‘world’ they represent and the viewer. In this way, the distance of depicted participants from the viewer is one of the materialisations (material realisations) of social interaction in a given context.
The system of Attitude
Apart from Contact and Social Distance, represented participants can be coded with another type of interactive meaning: Attitude of represented participants towards the viewer, or that of the given advertisement itself towards the addressee of the advertisement. What I mean by Attitude of represented participants includes the degree of involvement (how far a given participant is depicted to have possible involvement with the viewer and what it implies), which is realised by a horizontal angle and the power relationship between the participants and the viewer realised by the use of a vertical angle participants in the sense that it can place represented participants either ‘close’ or ‘away’ from the viewer’s standpoint. But here I use the word ‘attitude’ in a specific meaning that implies the degree of involvement and power relationship between represented participants and the viewer.
The degree of ‘involvement’ can be coded by angles from which represented participants are depicted. Represented participants can be photographed either with Frontal angle or Oblique angle. If a represented participant is depicted with the former type of perspective, the viewer is given a full dimension of the participant: this participants have an interactive meaning of involvement. Oblique angle, on the other hand, gives a sense of detachment in relation to the viewer position, in that oblique perspectives of represented participants restrict what can be seen by the viewer, in comparison to what the Frontal angle allows.
Power relationships between represented participants and the viewer can be manifested by the manipulation of another type of angle: vertical angles. For example, if a represented participant is photographed or represented from a high angle, this would allow the viewer of the text to ‘look down on’ them. If they are taken from a low angle, by contrast, the viewer is positioned where it looks as though represented participants are looking down on the viewer. To use Kress and van Leeuwen’s terms, the former realises Viewer power and the latter manifests Representation power, between the two of which is Equal power.
‘Visual directionality’, ‘Use of space’ and ‘Social interactions’ thus work as descriptive categories that allows documentation of given texts from the perspectives of three metafunctions of communication. In this paper, more notably, these three aspects are going to be dealt with from a cross-cultural perspective. That is, to compare the way in which Japanese and British visual representations realise these metafunctions through formal categories of ‘Visual directionality’, ‘Use of space’ and ‘Social interactions’. Figure 3 shows the three metafunctions in relation to analytical/descriptive categories that I am going to use in this paper.
Analytical/descriptive categories of visual syntax
Use of Space
Positioning of represented participants in relation to the Information
Values of Given and New
Social Distance ---------------- Social
Attitude -------------- Oblique
Vertical Equal power
Figure 3 Analytical/descriptive categories of visual syntax
3 Writing systems
Language, when it is written, as opposed to when it is spoken, is realised as a physical and graphic substance in a given space. In this sense, language can be treated as a visual entity. Thus when one looks at an advertisement which consists of both visual images and verbal captions, both elements (regardless of the type of medium: visual or verbal) come into the viewer’s eye as a visual entity, as a block of visual material and a block of language as text.
The visual, whether as image or as a block of language has semantic impact at that initial level: the viewer goes on to read the visual and recognise the linguistic meaning of the verbal captions. At the next level of analysis, the visual and the verbal are each treated in terms of their own ‘semantics’, the semantics of the visual as image and semantics of the verbal as linguistic message.
In Figure 4, I distinguished two kinds of visual directionality: i) that realised by visual images (‘pictorial directionality’) and ii) that realised by language (‘scriptorial directionality’).
The mode of realization
visually represented participants
(visual images)---> pictorial
verbally represented participants
(printed language)---> scriptorial
Figure 4 Types of visual directionality
The historical complexity of the Japanese system of writing makes it necessary to discuss it in relation to the Ideational, the Textual and the Interpersonal metafunction. I focus on two aspects in relation to the Japanese system of writing: that of choices in writing directions and that of writing units.
First, the range of writing directions available in Japanese are these: whereas English has a single way of writing: in rows; and from left to right, horizontally, with the rows ordered from top to bottom, using the letters of the Roman alphabets. Japanese has two choices of writing direction : horizontally in rows and vertically in columns. I call the former type horizontal writing and the latter vertical writing.
The horizontal writing proceeds in rows and from left to right as English, which creates the visual directionality of left to right. Vertical writing is written from top to bottom and each column proceeds from right to left. Horizontal writing creates the visual directionality of left to right (as an individual row), which guides the viewer’s reading direction from top to bottom as a sequence of rows. Vertical writing creates the visual directionality of top to bottom (as an individual column), and also produces the viewer’s reading direction from right to left as a sequence of columns.
In Japanese writing, horizontal and vertical writing forms can be juxtaposed within a single text. The use of multiple writing directions gives a text multiple visual directionality at the level of scriptorial directionality.
Vertical writing is the older form of writing in Japanese,
and consequently, can embody a sense of ‘traditionality’.
It can be used therefore as a signifier to imply Japanese ‘authenticity’ or ‘indigenity’’ as opposed to that suggested by the horizontal
way of writing, which suggests a western influence in the modern history of
The choice of writing direction serves three metafunctions: the Ideational, the Textual and the Interpersonal. For example, the writing direction may suggest a dynamic vectorial process, which is the Ideational metafunction. The choice between vertical and horizontal writing also realises a sense of ‘traditionality’ or ‘modernity’ and ‘Westernisation’, which is related to the Interpersonal metafunction. The particular choice of writing direction can guide a viewer’s readings of the directionality of a page as a whole, or direct reading in certain ways: this serves the Textual metafunction.
Second, the Japanese system has a choice of several types of writing units: the Interpersonal metafunction. Japanese writing makes use of characters (kanji) and two kinds of syllabaries called kana: hiragana and katakana. Each of the kana consists of fifty-four letters. Two types of kanas serve distinctive purposes: hiragana, which makes use of round, curved lines in its shapes, serves grammatical purposes in sentences: it is used for items such as articles and auxiliaries. Katakana, on the other hand, is characterised by its angular shapes; it is often used to write foreign words.
This characteristic of the Japanese writing system allows a number of choices for linguistic representation, in terms of ‘channels of realisation’. For example, it is possible to write a sentence using either hiragana or katakana alone or as a combination of two of them (hiragana and katakana) together with kanji (Chinese characters), depending on the type of writing.
The relative proportion of kanji used within a piece of writing (either at the sentence level or passage level) is one of the factors that realises the degree of formality. Formal writing has a higher proportion of kanji. The use of kanji is therefore closely related to the genre of writing. Legal documents, for instance, have a higher proportion of kanji than other types of writing, such as personal letters and children’s writing.
Children start learning to write using only hiragana and katakana, and the more advanced the level of writing, the greater proportion of kanjis he or she can mix with these kanas. In the usual writing of Japanese adults, both kanji and kana are mixed. If the writing consists only of kana, it gives the text a sense of ‘unaccomplished’ or ‘childish’ writing, in comparison with standard, ‘accepted’, or ‘adult-like’ writing style.
The physical appearance of these three writing systems has significant implications in terms of the Interpersonal metafunction of visual semiosis. Compared with kana, kanji has a higher density of visual elements on the page. Consequently, writing with a higher proportion of kanji is visually more dense than texts with a lower proportion of kanji. Given that the use of kanji is one marker of formality, the visual density created by the choice of writing systems is another semiotic feature contributing to the degree of formality. This, again leads to one aspect of realization of textual genre. Writing with a higher visual density means for users of the Japanese language, a high degree of formality, which serves the Interpersonal metafunction. Therefore, in Japanese, the degree of formality in writing can be manifested ‘visually’ by the choice and combination of these three writing methods.
4. Textual analysis and discussion
4.1 Visual directionality (The Ideational metafunction)
In this section, I will look at two sets of Japanese and British examples. The first set is Plates 1 and 2.
Plate 1 (Japanese) Plate 2 (British)
Both examples are a public sign for ‘exit’, which make use of a type of visual images called isotype. The isotype is a system established by the Viennese philosopher and social scientist Otto von Neurath (1937, 1948). It is a system where modified and simplified visual images are used to convey information to the general public. Von Neurath believed this system to be universally communicative, as opposed to the opacity of verbal language, which he viewed as "a disfiguring medium for knowledge" in that "its structure and vocabulary fail to be a consistent, logical model of objects and relations in the physical world" (Lupton 1989:145).
Lupton (Ibid) argues that, in order to "provide a universal bridge between language and nature", the isotype has to be reduced to an abstract representation, while sustaining the ‘vocabulary’, which is done at the cost of weakening the relationship between the image and the actual object. Another aspect of the isotype that makes it "universally acceptable" is as Lupton states, its consistency. The isotype can visualise the same concept across cultures. For example, to realise the concept ‘exit’, it is possible to use similar visual images regardless of the context in which they are used. The question arises here: can isotype representation be completely culturally neutral?
Plate 1 and Plate 2 show Japanese and British isotypes, respectively, which indicate the presence of an exit. Both of them realise the same meaning ("exit this way"), but they are realised with different visual directionality. In the case of Plate 1, the orientation of the image of the human figure is to the left, while in Plate 2, the orientation of the represented participant is in the opposite direction. If, as von Neurath suggested, the isotype provides universality in the manifestation of visual information, the question arises regarding this difference in visual directionality: how can this difference in visual directionality be explained?
It is this feature which makes the isotype a useful starting point. As a sign, it is meant to be universal, yet its spatial orientation differs in the two cultures. My hypothesis is that the lexical aspects (the lexical content) are independently variable in relation to spatial orientation, and that the latter realises deep cultural configurations of the visual semiotic. Spatial orientation, right to left, or left to right, creates, implicitly, an indication of directionality.
Plate 3 is an opening advertising campaign of Keikyu Department Store, in
Plate 3 Keikyu Department Store advertisement
Plate 4 is another Japanese example in which a represented participant realises the visual directionality of right to left. This is an advertisement from Sumitomo Bank, for its instant loan service. There is a cartoon image of a black bear, which is walking towards the left, creating the visual directionality of right to left. Next to the cartoon bear is a verbal caption, which says, "Sumitomo card is always on my side and that’s definitely something that I can rely on".
The cartoon bear is represented to be doing the right (‘sensible’) action; now that the cartoon bear has this card, the message is that, he is heading in the ‘right’, ‘forward’, or ‘positive’ direction, in the sense that he can rely on this loan service, even in an emergency. It can be argued therefore that the visual directionality of right to left (which is realised by the image of cartoon character) manifests ‘positive’ values in the context of this Japanese advertisement.
Plate 4 Sumitomo Bank advertisement
Plate 5 and 6 are poster advertisements taken from the Evening Standard newspaper. (Plate 6 is my drawing of the original advertising poster.) They makes use of visual directionality with a ‘negative’ or ‘backward’ implication, in order to make the ‘positive’ and ‘forward’ direction stand out. In other words, these advertisements attempt to make a selling point from giving represented participants the visual directionality with ‘negative’ implications,
Plate 5 Evening Standard advertisement
Plate 6 Evening Standard advertisement
(Abstract representation of the original)
The copy in Plate 5 reads, "Looking for something better suited to your talents?", with a cartoon image of an elephant with glasses and a tie, with a smug expression on its face, followed by a man with a sulky-looking face, carrying a shovel and a bucket. This is a symbolic representation of a boss and his subordinate at work, where the latter is pushed around by the former; a work environment which is far from satisfactory on the part of the subordinate. The man, who is behind the boss, realises the visual directionality of right to left.
That this is a depiction of an unwanted situation, or that this is not how it ought to be, is being formally shown by this directionality of right to left (realised by ‘the man in trouble’) as something ‘negative’. In other words, in the context of British advertisements, an unwanted and negative sense is realised by the visual directionality of right to left. This ‘negative’ visual directionality of right to left is based on the ‘forward’ and ‘positive’ directionality of left to right.
A similar message in terms of the implication of visual directionality is conveyed in the other example, Plate 6. This is an image of a boy on a skateboard, facing towards the left. In fact, the verbal copy reinforces this point: "Are you going in the right direction?", making an explicit point that the boy is not going in the right direction. Here as with Plate 5, a sense of ‘negativeness’ is visually expressed by the use of the visual directionality of right to left.
In this way, the visual representation of visual directionality which is read as ‘negative’ in Plate 5 and 6 sheds light on what is ‘forward’ and ‘positive’ directionality in the context of British advertisements. The visual directionality of right to left, which implies a negative sense in the context of British advertisements, would have realised a different meaning in the context of Japanese advertisements: where the visual directionality of right to left manifests a sense of ‘positiveness’, in Japan both participants (a man trailing behind an elephant as his boss, a boy on the skateboard) are already in the right direction. Both Plate 5 and Plate 6 prove that visual directionality is not merely a formal property, which is given to represented participants, but realises the core meaning of the advertising message.
Summary of 4.1
I have focused on one aspect of the Ideational metafunction: visual directionality as processes embodied in represented participants. Examples that I have dealt with so far have suggested that the visual directionality of right to left is prominent in Japanese visual representations, while British examples have a tendency to realise the visual directionality of left to right. Each directionality correlates with the scriptorial directionality of its language, the traditional way of writing Japanese and that of English.
This correlation between scriptorial directionality and pictorial directionality could be explained by an assumption that both Japanese and English writing systems are realisations of the underlying spatial semiosis of each culture. In other words, given that language is one of many semiotic modes which are involved in human communication, it may be possible to postulate that directionality of language (writing) is governed by an underlying spatial semiosis, which also governs the visual mode.
The difference of the prominent directionality between Japanese and British examples indicates each culture has a different (and separate) underlying spatial semiotic system, which influences and determines the existing semiotic modes in use in that culture. It may be said that the visual directionality of right to left is one manifestation of the underlying spatial semiotic system of Japanese culture, while the directionality of left to right is rooted in a different spatial semiotic system, which is characteristic of Anglophone cultures. Figure 5 is an abstract representation of underlying spatial semiosis of each culture.
Visual mode Writing Visual mode Writing
Japanese spatial semiotics British spatial semiotics
Figure 5 Underlying spatial semiotic systems
Given that each culture has a specific underlying spatial semiotic system, it follows that the difference in visual directionality between Japanese and British examples is not merely a formal distinction. Formal structure, like visual directionality, can itself manifest cultural implications. The differences in visual directionality are culturally motivated. In other words, visual directionality embodies the cultural metaphor of direction.
4.2 Use of Space (The Textual metafunction)
First of all, I will focus on the way in which the Left/Right part of textual space realises meaning. I will begin with a set of Japanese and British advertisements (Plates 7 and 8, respectively). Plate 7 advertises a male hairpiece, which appeared in the Japanese magazine Spa. The main copy reads, "Ours is just different. You can rely on Svenson even on holiday". There are two photographs above the lead copy, both of which show a family of three (who appear to be on holiday; there is a suitcase, on which a little girl is sitting and the man is carrying a travel bag on his shoulder). These two photographs indicate the difference in the man’s hair: in the left photograph, the man is represented as having hair, while the other photograph on the right shows him bald.
Plate 8 is an advertisement for cosmetic surgery by The Pountney Clinic, which is taken from the British women’s magazine Cosmopolitan. It shows photographs of part of the bodies of a patient who went through cosmetic surgery with this clinic. For example, the photograph on the top left side shows two states of a woman’s nose; the image on the left hand side shows a woman with her nose (before surgery) and the other image shows the same woman with her operated nose (after surgery). These sets of images have in common that the left side image is a depiction of a supposedly problematic situation, which can be improved, they suggest, to achieve a better state.
Plate 7 (Japanese) Plate 8 (British)
Plates 7 and 8 indicate that the visual image in both advertisements realises temporal process of ‘before’ and ‘after’. In the case of Plate 7, there is a temporal process of ‘before’ using a Svenson hairpiece and ‘after’ using the product. Images in Plate 8 indicate ‘before’ cosmetic surgery and ‘after’ the surgery. In other words, a set of two images manifests two stages: a problematic situation and a situation where the problem has been solved.
I would like to note however that these two advertisements have a different positioning of these two stages (‘before’ and ‘after’): the Japanese example has its problematic situation (‘before’ stage) on the right and the improved situation (‘after’ stage) on the left. The British example, by contrast, realises the former in the left and the latter in the right.
Summary of 4.2
In terms of information value of Given and New, the Japanese text realises Given in the right and New in the left, while the British text manifests Given in the left and New in the right. Given in both texts suggests a status quo, the situation that is ‘already there’ or the point of departure, which leads to the New, something that is newly gained, or something that is worth paying attention to. A framework (distribution of values in visual domain) proposed by Kress and van Leeuwen (1996) can be applied to the British example, but not to the Japanese one. My assumption here is that Japanese visual representations tend to allow the realization of Given in the right and New in the left, which is different from that of British visual representations. Figure 6 shows an abstract representation of Given/New distribution of Japanese and British examples.
Figure 6 Given/New distribution of Japanese and British examples
4.3 Social Interactions (The Interpersonal metafunction)
This section will focus on the way in which visual representations manifest the relationship between represented participants and the viewer; ‘social interactions’ between them. Kress and van Leeuwen (1996) draw their examples of Western visual representations from school textbooks, a poster and paintings as well as advertisements, to which they apply the system of Contact, Social Distance and Attitude and through which they consider the notion of modality: they are concerned with the way in which visual syntax (or formal structures) construct the relationship between represented participants and the viewer, and the ‘world’ of visual representations in relation to the viewer in everyday life.
Given that, the present section will compare Interpersonal meaning making between Japanese and British advertising texts. It can be assumed, from what has been discussed in section 4.2, that advertising texts from the two different cultures manifest Interpersonal functions in different ways. I will draw attention to how the systems of Contact, Social Distance and Attitude are realised in the sample given texts, and what the systematic differences, if any, can suggest or reveal about underlying Japanese and British semiotic systems.
I will use two sets of Japanese and British examples, which
are campaigns for the same products, which cross the cultural boundaries of
Example 1 Organics
Plates 9 and 10 show a Japanese and a British advertisement for Organics, respectively. Plate 9 is taken from the Japanese women’s magazine With, and Plate 10 is from the British women’s magazine Marie Claire. Both advertisements appeared at approximately the same time (June 1996), and they are both two-page spreads.
Plate 9 Organics advertisement (Japanese)
Plate 10 Organics advertisement (British)
In the case of the Japanese example, there is a Japanese-looking woman with long straight dark hair, which reaches down to her chest. She is wearing a multi-coloured dress. She has make-up on, with red nail varnish on her left hand, which is resting on her chest. In the British example, there is an image of a Western woman, with long wavy hair, which is ‘standing up on end’. She has a touch of make-up and is photographed with a mid shot: her body is shown down to her shoulders.
Example 2 De Beers Diamond Ring
Plates 11 and 12 are a Japanese and a British advertisement for the De Beers Diamond Ring, respectively. The former is taken from the Japanese women’s magazine With, and the latter appeared in the British women’s magazine Cosmopolitan. As in the previous examples (Plates 9 and 10), these advertisements were released at around the same time (in November and December 1997).
The types of represented participants they include are similar in both examples: there is one female represented participant against a dark background. In the Japanese example, the woman is depicted clasping her hands in front of her face. The British woman in Plate 12 shows her left hand over the lower part of her face. Both have an image of the advertised product as non-human participants: a diamond ring (in Plate 11) and images of diamond stones (in Plates 11 and 12), although they are placed in different parts of the text.
Plate 11 (Japanese) Plate 12 (British)
The system of Contact
First of all, I would like to focus on the system of Contact in the first set of examples (Example 1 hereafter: the Organics advertisements) Plates 9 and 10. The human represented participant in Plate 9 is not engaged in eye contact with the viewer: the Offer Contact. She is looking down slightly, while the female participant in Plate 10 is depicted with eye contact, smiling at the viewer: Demand Contact. It can be said that the former is engaged in a ‘passive’ interaction and the latter is in an ‘active’ interaction, because the Offer Contact in the Japanese looking woman makes herself ‘to be looked at’, without any direct contact with the viewer and the Demand Contact in the British woman is highly interactive with the viewer through eye contact.
With respect to the second set of examples (Example 2 hereafter: De Beers diamond ring advertisements), the Japanese model in Plate 11 has Offer Contact, without any direct eye contact with the viewer represented; she is depicted as looking down, while ‘smiling’. This Japanese model therefore interacts with the viewer with a formal marker of Offer, which is accompanied by the lexis ‘smiling’. The British model in Plate 12, on the other hand, is represented with Demand Contact in that she has direct eye contact with the viewer; more precisely, the interactive meaning is created which consists of a formal realisation of Demand Contact and a lexical feature ‘smiling’. Although both are smiling, the degree of the smile is different between the two examples: the Japanese model is more ‘subtly’ smiling than the British model, who presents an ‘explicit’ or ‘wide’ smile.
I now consider what this choice of Contact types (Offer in the Japanese examples in Plates 9 and 11, Demand in the British examples in Plates 10 and 12) might be suggesting about the cultures of Japan and Britain, in relation to the depiction of women, given that culturally and socially accepted or determined values can be encoded in the choice of interactive markers. The use of Offer in the Japanese examples might be read as a manifestation of what Japanese women are ‘expected to be like’ in Japanese society, that is, they are something that is passive and to be ‘looked at’, or ‘visually appreciated’. In other words, the interactive meaning Offer Contact can realise a culturally accepted image of women. With respect to the British examples (Plates 10 and 12), the Demand Contact in the female participants represents them as more actively interactive in relation to the viewer, compared to their Japanese counterparts. It might follow, therefore, that the Demand type of Contact is realising a ‘culturally favoured’ image of women in British society.
The system of Social Distance
I now focus on interactive meanings realised by the system of Social Distance. In the case of Example 1 (Plate 9 and 10), the Japanese model is photographed with a longer shot than the British model. The former shows her body ‘from upper waist up’ (a mid shot), which creates Far personal distance and the latter is photographed in the manner that reveals the head and shoulders (a close up), which realises Close personal distance. In other words, the formal representation of ‘a close up’ functions as a signifier of ‘closer’ distance between the represented participant and the viewer than that of ‘a mid shot’. The Japanese model in Plate 9 has a greater Social Distance from the viewer than the British one in Plate 10. The type of Social Distance the British model is engaged in locates the viewer in a closer position in relation to her, while the Japanese models are shown at a greater distance from the viewer.
In the case of Example 2 (Plates 11 and 12), both the Japanese and the British participants are shown at the same distance from the viewer: only their head and shoulders are shown, which is categorised as Close personal distance. This might imply therefore, these participants (both Japanese and British models) are represented as someone who is ‘close to’ the viewer, in other words, a sense of personal relation between the participants and the viewer is created. The representation of the participants in a relatively close proximity to the viewer can convey the message ‘it could happen to you [the viewer]’ or it could be you’.
Just as the choice of Contact can represent the
cultural value systems of
The system of Attitude
Regarding the system of Attitude in Example 1, the Japanese female model in Plate 9 is photographed from a lower angle, which realises Representation power. The British model (Plate 10) is photographed with Equal power. The former angle from which the represented participant is depicted makes them slightly ‘looking down on’ the viewer, in other words, the Representation power angle positions the viewer so as to ‘look up to’ the represented participants. The latter type of angle: Equal power locates the viewer at the same level with that of the viewer.
In the case of Example 2, I would like to note, first of all, the choice of Frontal and Oblique angles from which the Japanese and the British models are photographed. The British model in Plate 12 is depicted as facing the viewer with full involvement, being ‘straight on’, which is created by the use of the Frontal angle in use. The Oblique angle from which the Japanese model is taken makes her appear as if she was facing the viewer at a slight angle, which can imply partial involvement, as opposed to full involvement.
I now focus on what can be derived from the choice of the system of Attitude. Regarding Example 1, the significance of the difference between Representation power in the Japanese example (Plate 9) and the choice of Equal power in the British example (Plate 10). The latter type of angle creates a sense of a closer interaction between the represented participants and the viewer, compared to the case of the Japanese example, because the representation of the British model is at equal eye level it gives a sense of greater proximity to the viewer than from the Japanese represented participants, taken from a lower angle. Representation power in the Japanese model, by contrast, gives rise to a sense of ‘remoteness’ and ‘aloofness’ from the viewer. Also Representation power in this Japanese participant allows stronger control (power) as an ideal: literally someone to look up to.
In the case of Example 2, the Oblique angle from which the Japanese model is photographed (in Plate 11) creates a sense of detachment from the viewer, in comparison to its British counterpart (Plate 12), where the Frontal angle enables the participant to be represented as a more closely interactive figure in relation to the viewer.
The difference in the formal realisation of Attitudinal meanings between the Japanese and the British examples in Examples 1 and 2 may have cultural implications, which are specific to each culture. As is the case with the system of Contact and Social Distance, discussed earlier, the fact that the Japanese and the British model are represented with different meanings of Attitude in relation to the viewer might also represent a particular aspect of Japanese and British cultural value systems.
The fact that the Japanese models in Plates 9 and 11 are given Representation power while the British models in Plates 10 and 12 are in Equal power relation to the viewer suggests that the individual viewer for the Japanese examples is given less power over the represented participants compared to that of the British examples. This might imply one aspect of Japanese cultural value system where a figure of ‘authority’ (such as a person in an advertisement or the institution they represent) is put before individuals.
The Oblique angle from which the Japanese model is taken (in Plate 11) represents these participants as ‘distanced’ from the viewer. In other words, the formal feature (the use of Oblique angle) therefore serves as a signifier of the ‘remoteness’ of the represented participant from the viewer. This type of interactive meaning of Attitude might be serving as a formal manifestation of the Japanese cultural value system, with respect to women’s position in society, where women are supposed to be less forward and more subservient.
With respect to the representation of the British cultural value system, a sense of closer interaction created by the choice of the Frontal angle with the meaning of Involvement can be a reflection of different values, which is related to its representation of the image of women as much more forward and closely interactive figures, in comparison to Japanese women’s ‘passiveness’ and ‘remoteness’.
Summary of 4.3
In this section, I have examined two sets of advertisements
in order to see how similarly and differently the Japanese and British examples
manifest the Interpersonal function: the manifestation of interactive meanings
between represented participants and the viewer. Both sets of advertisements (Examples
1 and 2) are campaigns for the same product: advertisements that
cross the cultural boundaries of
Across the two sets of examples, the Japanese and the British advertisements consist of similar lexical items, in terms of the type of represented participants in use. For example, in the case of Example 1, both the Japanese and the British texts show the image of a female participant in a similar background, together with images of the products. The Japanese and the British campaign for the De Beers Diamond Ring have a similar organisation of what is represented in that each has an image of a female model, who is wearing a diamond ring, placed against a plain background.
It is the level of formal or syntactical realisation that differentiates the Japanese examples (Plates 9 and 11) and the British examples (Plates 10 and 12), in terms of interactive meaning making between the represented participants and the viewer. Most notably, as far as the examples I have dealt with in this section are concerned, the Japanese model and the British model are represented in a different system of interactive markers, which gives rise to different interactive meanings between them.
In the case of both Examples 1 and 2, it can be pointed out that the Japanese models tend to be depicted with a sense of ‘passiveness’, looking away from the viewer, and the British models are, by contrast, represented as more ‘active’ and ‘forward’ figures. The choice of one interactive marker instead of another realises this tendency. For example, the Japanese models both in Plate 9 and 11 are engaged in the Offer Contact, without direct eye contact with the viewer, while their British counterparts are shown with Demand Contact, which allows the viewer direct contact with the participant.
The different choice of horizontal and vertical angles from which each participant is shot can also be attributed to different realisations of interactive meanings: the Oblique angle from which the photograph of the Japanese model in Plate 11 is taken makes her appear less involved with the viewer, in comparison to its British counterpart (in Plate 12), who is photographed with a Frontal angle, which suggests a fuller involvement with the viewer. While the Japanese participant in Plate 9 is represented with Representation power in relation to the viewer, the British model in Plate 10 is photographed from the eye level of the viewer (Equal power). Overall, due to the choice of the interactive markers in the system of Attitude, the Japanese models are less interactive with the viewer than the British ones: there is a greater distance from the viewer to the Japanese participants than to the British ones.
I would now like to consider what can be drawn from these
differences in the formal realisation between the
Japanese and the British advertisements, when the same type
of lexical items are used. It can be argued that the different choice of
forms: interactive meaning markers, itself has significance in terms of the
cultural values of
I have discussed visual representations in Japanese and British advertisements with reference to the three notion of metafunctions. My analysis has demonstrated that both Japanese and British visual semiotics are conditioned by a different underlying spatial semiotic systems. This goes against the notion of culturally transparency of visuals. Visual representations and the way in which they convey meaning is culturally conditioned.
I have focused exclusively on the formal structures of visual representation in this paper. What my discussion suggests is; if visual lexis can serve as cultural representation, so can visual syntax. For the full understanding of visual representations from a cross-cultural perspective, a further systematic study on visual syntax as well as visual lexis should become essential. In conclusion, cultures condition visual forms and visual forms represent cultures.
Haarman, Harald 1986. The use of foreign language as symbols of
Hall, Edward 1964. Silent assumptions in social communication In: Disorders of Communication 42:41-55
Hall, Edward 1969. The Hidden Dimension: man’s use of
space in public and private
M.A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic -The Social Interpretation of
Language and Meaning
M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Hodge, Robert and Gunther
Kress 1988. Social Semiotics
and van Leeuwen 1990. Reading
and van Leeuwen 1996. Reading Images -The Grammar of Visual Design
Lupton, Ellen 1989. Reading Isotype
In: Margolin Victor (ed) Design
Neurath, Otto von 1937. International
Neurath, Otto von 1948. Basic By Isotype London: London Basic Publishing Company
Rumiko 1998. Visual Semiotics: A Study of Images in Japanese Advertisements
unpublished PhD thesis,
Masayoshi 1990. The Languages of
Intercultural Communication, ISSN 1404-1634, 2000, April,
Editor: Prof. Jens Allwood