Has The Cat Got Your Tongue? Second Language Factors in Intercultural Difficulty Management

Min Hou (1), Howard Nicholas (2), Keith Simkin (3)
(1) Shanghai Institute of Foreign Trade, People's Republic of China., China,
(2) Faculty of Education, La Trobe University, Austria,
(3) Faculty of Education, La Trobe University, Australia


Previous intercultural communication research has relatively underplayed the influence of second language factors. This underplaying arises for three reasons: 1) the over-emphasis on the influence of cultural differences in intercultural communication; 2) the prevalent assumption that communication style in intercultural communication is the same as that in intra-cultural communication; 3) the dominant (post-) positive research approach in intercultural communication leading to the overlooking of linguistic factors and context. This paper reports an exploratory study on the influence of linguistic factors in intercultural communication by taking an interpretive research approach. It shows that in the process of dealing with intercultural difficulties in Australia, Chinese overseas students with different self-perceptions of second language (L2) communicative competence can influence their face concerns and difficulty management strategies in different ways.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Bialystock, E. (1990). Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of second language use. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomenon. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). Pronouns of power and solidarity In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, England ; Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.

Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2-28). London Longman.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1

Chai, C., & Chai, W. (1965). The sacred books of Confucius and other Confucian classics. New York: Bantam Books, Inc.

Chang, H.-C., & Holt, G. R. (1994). A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), Challenge of facework (pp. 95-132). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London; New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Cupach, W., & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326986

Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4 ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In C. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Gao, G. (1998). "Don't take my word for it"--understanding Chinese speaking practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 163-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00003-0

Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contributions to second language learning: Part Ⅱ. Affective variables Language Teaching, 26, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800000045

Goffman, E. (1955). On facework: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.

Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O

Gudykunst, W. (1994). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gudykunst, W. (2002). Intercultural communication theories. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural and intercultural communication (2nd ed., pp. 183-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gudykunst, W. (2003). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229706

Ho, D. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226145

Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese Concept of "face". American Anthropology, 46, 45-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040

Hymes, D. H. (1971). On communicative competence. Philadelphia, P.A.: University of Philadelphia Press.

Hymes, D. H. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35-71). New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.

Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jensen, I. (2004). The practice of intercultural communication: Reflections for professionals in cultural encounters. In T. Gavan (Ed.), Resituating culture (pp. 1-17). Strasburg: Council of Europe Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v3i2.387

Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kramsch, C. (1998). The privilege of the intercultural speaker. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Foreign language learning in intercultural perspective (pp. 16-31). Cambridge: CUP.

Lim, T., & Bowers, J. (1991). Face-work: Solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.x

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lustig, M., & Koester, J. (2003). Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3

Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2007). Intercultural communication in contexts (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Oetzel, J. (2009). Intercultural communication: A layered approach. New York: Vango Books.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Poulisse, N. (1990). The use of compensatory strategies by Dutch learners of English. Dordrecht: Foris Publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868975

Rogan, R. G., & Hammer, M. R. (1994). Crisis negotiation: A preliminary investigation of facework in naturalistic conflict discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 216-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889409365399

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage IRAL, 10, 209-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed., pp. 11-47). London: Continuum.

Spencer-Oatey, H., & Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural interaction: A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244511

Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreign talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning 30(2), 417-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00326.x

Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict style: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213-235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: an updated face-negotiation theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003252955-8

Ting-Toomey, S. (2007). Intercultural conflict training: Theory-practice approaches and research challenges. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 255-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737199

Ting-Toomey, S. (Ed.). (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 187-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2

Ting-Toomey, S., Yee-Jung, K., Shapiro, R., Garcia, W., Wright, T., & Oetzel, J. (2000). Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four U.S. ethnic groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(1), 47-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00023-1

Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310308666654

Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 159-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1981.9924368


Min Hou
Howard Nicholas
Keith Simkin
k.simkin@latrobe.edu.au (Primary Contact)
Author Biographies

Min Hou, Shanghai Institute of Foreign Trade, People's Republic of China.

Min Hou, a lecturer at School of languages, Shanghai Institute of Foreign Trade, China. Her research interests are in intercultural communication, second language teaching and learning.

Howard Nicholas, Faculty of Education, La Trobe University

Dr. Keith Simkin, A Lecturer at the Faculty of Education, La Trobe University, Australia. He has wide research and teaching experience in intercultural communication and second language teaching.

Keith Simkin, Faculty of Education, La Trobe University

Dr. Keith Simkin, A Lecturer at the Faculty of Education, La Trobe University, Australia. He has wide research and teaching experience in intercultural communication and second language teaching.

Hou, M., Nicholas, H., & Simkin, K. (2012). Has The Cat Got Your Tongue? Second Language Factors in Intercultural Difficulty Management. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v12i1.587

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_
  • Abstract 98
  • Download PDF 32