Sensual Shock Promoting the Study of Sentience in Theorizing Culture Shock
Abstract
This theoretical essay examines the need for greater understanding of the cultural mind of sojourners by examining the role of embodiment and sentience in our theorizing of “culture shock” and cultural adaptation. Theoretical and empirical/experiential bases for treating sensual experiences as a basis and form of human discourse are provided, followed by a brief historical overview of the theorizing of culture shock and cultural adaptation. “Sensual shock” is advanced as sensitizing concept that serves as a corollary to existing theories of adaptation. A brief exemplar from previous research demonstrates the relevance of sensual shock to intercultural sojourns. Finally, the theoretical and practical benefits of this shift toward understanding cultural discourses in theorizing are explored.
Full text article
References
Barna, L. M. (1976). How culture shock effects communication. Communication 5 (1), 1-18.
Beavin, T. (2007.) A life in the sun: Accounts of new lives abroad as intercultural narratives. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7 (3), 188-202.
Bennett, M. J. & Castiglioni, I. (2004). Embodied ethnocentrism and the feeling of culture. In D. Landis J. M. Bennett & M. J. Bennett(Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3:rd ed.) (pp. 249-265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Braithwaite, C. (1990). Communicative silence: A cross-cultural study of Basso's hypothesis. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact (pp. 321-327). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Byrnes, F. (1966). Role shock: An occupational hazard of American technical assistants abroad. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 368, 95-108.
Carbaugh, D. (1988). Comments on “culture” in Communication inquiry. Communication Reports, 1 (1), 38-41.
Carey, J. (1975). A cultural approach to communication. Communication 2, 1-22.
Chen, G. (1992). Communication adaptability and interaction involvement as predictors of cross-cultural adjustment. Communication Research Reports, 9 (1), 33-41.
Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of sense. New York: Routledge.
Fontaine, G. (1997). Skills for successful international assignments to, from, and within Asia and the Pacific: Implications for preparation, support and training. Management Decision, 35(8), 631-643. doi: 10.1108/00251749710176190
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
Gordon, R. D. (2007). Beyond the failures of Western communication theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 89-107. doi: 10.2167/md090.0
Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory, (pp. 8-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gudykunst,W. B. (1998). Applying anxiety/ uncertainty management (AUM) theory to intercultural adjustment training. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 187-227. doi 10-1016S0147-1767
Gudykunst, W. B. & Hammer, M. R. (1988). Strangers and hosts: An uncertainty reduction based theory of intercultural adaptation. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Cross-cultural adaptation: Current approaches, (pp. 106-139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gullahorn, J. & Gullahorn, J. (1963). An extension of the U-curve hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 19 (3), 33-47.
Howes, D. (1991). Olfaction and transition. In D. Howes (Ed.) The varieties of sensory experience (pp. 128-147). Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
Howes, D. (2005). Introduction. In D. Howes (Ed.) Empire of the senses, (pp. 1-17). New York, NY: Berg.
Isa, M. (2000). Phenomenological analysis of the reentry experiences of the wives of Japanese corporate sojourners. Women & Language 23 (2), 26-40.
Kim. M. S. (2009). Cultural bias in communication science: Challenges of overcoming ethnocentric paradigms in Asia. Asian Journal of Communication, 19(4), 412-421.
Kim, Y. (2007). Communication experiences of Korean expatriates in the U. S.: A study of cross cultural adaptation. Human Communication 10 (3), 213-230.
Kim, Y. Y. (1988). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Kim, Y. Y. (1995). Cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp.170-193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kim, Y. Y. (2005). Adapting to a new culture: An integrative communication theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, (pp. 375-400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Koester, J. (1984). Communication and the intercultural reentry: A course proposal. Communication Education, 33 (3), 251-256. doi: 10.1080/03634528409384749
Lin, C. (2006). Culture shock and social support: An investigation of a Chinese student organization on a U. S. campus. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35 (2), 117-137.
Lysgaard, S. (1955). Adjustment in a foreign society: Norwegian Fulbright grantees visiting the United States. International Social Science Bulletin, 7, 45-51.
Martin, J. N. (1984). The intercultural reentry: Conceptualizations and directions for future research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 115-134. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(84)90035-X
Martin, J. N. (1986). Patterns of communication in three types of re-entry relationships: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 50 (1): 183-189.
Martin, J. N. & Harrell, T. (1996). Reentry training for intercultural sojourners. In D. Landis & R. S. Bhaghat(Eds.) Handbook of Intercultural Training (2:nd ed.) (pp. 307-326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Milstein, T. (2005). Transformation abroad: Sojourning and the perceived enhancement of self efficacy. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29 (2), 217-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.05.005
Oberg, K. (1960). Culture shock: Adjustment of new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 7, 177-182.
Pearce, W. B. (1995). A sailing guide for social constructionists. In W. Leeds-Hurwitz (Ed.), Social approaches to Communication (pp. 88-113). New York: The Guilford Press.
Pederson, Paul. (1994). The five stages of culture shock: Critical incidents around the world. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Rohrlich, B. F. & Martin, J. N. (1991). Host country and reentry adjustment of student sojourners. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15 (2), 163-182.
Sheldrake, R. (2003). The sense of being stared at. New York: Crown Publishers.
Smalley, W. A. (1963). Culture shock, language shock, and the shock of self-discovery. Practical Anthropology, 10, 49-56.
Smith, S. (2001). An identity model of reentry communication competence. World Communication Journal,30 (3/4), 6-38.
Steffen, E. & Coyle, A. (2011). Sense of presence experiences and meaning making in bereavement: A qualitative analysis. Death Studies, 35(7), 579-609.
Stoller, Paul. (1997). Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Stoller, P. (2004). Sensuous ethnography, African persuasions, and social knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (6), 817-835.
Turner, J. H. (1991). The structure of sociological theory (5:th edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Vannini, P., Waskul, D. & Gottschalk, S. (2012). The senses in self, society, and culture. New York: Routeldge.
Ward, C. A., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock (2:nd ed).Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
Ye, J. (2006). Traditional and online support networks in the cross-cultural adaptation of Chinese international students in the United States. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (3), 863-876. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00039.x
Yum, J.O. (1988). Network theory in intercultural communication. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.) Theorizing intercultural communication (pp. 239-258). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zaharna, R. S. (1989). Self shock: The double-binding challenge of identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13, 501-525.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2015 Sally O. Hastings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.