Has The Cat Got Your Tongue? Second Language Factors in Intercultural Difficulty Management
Abstract
Previous intercultural communication research has relatively underplayed the influence of second language factors. This underplaying arises for three reasons: 1) the over-emphasis on the influence of cultural differences in intercultural communication; 2) the prevalent assumption that communication style in intercultural communication is the same as that in intra-cultural communication; 3) the dominant (post-) positive research approach in intercultural communication leading to the overlooking of linguistic factors and context. This paper reports an exploratory study on the influence of linguistic factors in intercultural communication by taking an interpretive research approach. It shows that in the process of dealing with intercultural difficulties in Australia, Chinese overseas students with different self-perceptions of second language (L2) communicative competence can influence their face concerns and difficulty management strategies in different ways.
Full text article
References
Bialystock, E. (1990). Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of second language use. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomenon. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). Pronouns of power and solidarity In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, England ; Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2-28). London Longman.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Chai, C., & Chai, W. (1965). The sacred books of Confucius and other Confucian classics. New York: Bantam Books, Inc.
Chang, H.-C., & Holt, G. R. (1994). A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), Challenge of facework (pp. 95-132). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London; New York: Routledge.
Cupach, W., & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4 ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In C. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Gao, G. (1998). "Don't take my word for it"--understanding Chinese speaking practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 163-186.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contributions to second language learning: Part Ⅱ. Affective variables Language Teaching, 26, 1-11.
Goffman, E. (1955). On facework: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257.
Gudykunst, W. (1994). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Gudykunst, W. (2002). Intercultural communication theories. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural and intercultural communication (2nd ed., pp. 183-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gudykunst, W. (2003). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ho, D. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867-884.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese Concept of "face". American Anthropology, 46, 45-64.
Hymes, D. H. (1971). On communicative competence. Philadelphia, P.A.: University of Philadelphia Press.
Hymes, D. H. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35-71). New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, I. (2004). The practice of intercultural communication: Reflections for professionals in cultural encounters. In T. Gavan (Ed.), Resituating culture (pp. 1-17). Strasburg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kramsch, C. (1998). The privilege of the intercultural speaker. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Foreign language learning in intercultural perspective (pp. 16-31). Cambridge: CUP.
Lim, T., & Bowers, J. (1991). Face-work: Solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415-450.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE.
Lustig, M., & Koester, J. (2003). Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403-426.
Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2007). Intercultural communication in contexts (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Oetzel, J. (2009). Intercultural communication: A layered approach. New York: Vango Books.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poulisse, N. (1990). The use of compensatory strategies by Dutch learners of English. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.
Rogan, R. G., & Hammer, M. R. (1994). Crisis negotiation: A preliminary investigation of facework in naturalistic conflict discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 216-231.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage IRAL, 10, 209-231.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed., pp. 11-47). London: Continuum.
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural interaction: A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreign talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning 30(2), 417-431.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict style: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213-235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: an updated face-negotiation theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2007). Intercultural conflict training: Theory-practice approaches and research challenges. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 255-271.
Ting-Toomey, S. (Ed.). (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 187-225.
Ting-Toomey, S., Yee-Jung, K., Shapiro, R., Garcia, W., Wright, T., & Oetzel, J. (2000). Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four U.S. ethnic groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(1), 47-81.
Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 159-170.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2012 Min Hou, Howard Nicholas, Keith Simkin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
Article Details
How to Cite
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Min Hou, Face and Identity in Intercultural Conflict Management , Journal of Intercultural Communication: Vol. 23 No. 2 (2023)