Development of Heutogogy Model as a Framework to Prepare Self-Determined Educator: A Case Study in Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to develop a heutogogy learning model which determines indigenous resources to improve numeracy literacy for high school educator to prepare their educator against disruptive education. This type of research is development research by using the ADDIE method according to two stages, namely (a) exploratory research to identify educator characteristics and needs, and (b) development research to develop a heutogogy model based on educators' needs. Heutogogy model succeeded in increasing educator numeracy literacy in high school as a preparation to create competent educators in a disruptive education era. This model has also succeeded in improving the literacy-numerical skills of teachers as primary agents of the information literacy movement in schools. By improving the educators' numerical skills, the model contributes to their overall information literacy, empowering them to better guide students in the rapidly evolving educational landscape characterized by disruptive changes. Need further research to implement this model on the different competencies with more deep user validation. This research can boost educators' literacy-numerical abilities, which are needed by the world of education in the next 10 years.
Full text article
References
Akmal, M., & Pritchett, L. (2021). Learning equity requires more than equality: Learning goals and achievement gaps between the rich and the poor in five developing countries⋆. International Journal of Educational Development, 82(January), 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102350
Arquero, J. L., Fernández-Polvillo, C., & Jiménez-Cardoso, S. M. (2024). Financial literacy in tourism and management & business administration entry-level students: A comparative view. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 34(October 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100474
Berndt, M., Schmidt, F. M., Sailer, M., Fischer, F., Fischer, M. R., & Zottmann, J. M. (2021). Investigating statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in medical-, social sciences-, and economics students. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101963
Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
Boeren, E., & Íñiguez-Berrozpe, T. (2022). Unpacking PIAAC’s cognitive skills measurements through engagement with Bloom’s taxonomy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101151
Boudard, E., & Jones, S. (2003). The IALS approach to defining and measuring literacy skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.04.003
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Vol. 6, Issue 11). Springer Scienceþ Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Bruce, C. S. (2002). Information Literacy as a Catalyst for Educational Change. A Background Paper. The 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference, January 2002, 8–19.
Campbell, L., Gray, S., MacIntyre, T., & Stone, K. (2020). Literacy, numeracy and health and wellbeing across learning: Investigating student teachers’ confidence. International Journal of Educational Research, 100(January), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101532
Chiswick, B. R., Lee, Y. L., & Miller, P. W. (2003). Schooling, literacy, numeracy and labour market success. Economic Record, 79(245), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.t01-1-00096
Conica, M., Nixon, E., & Quigley, J. (2023). Talk outside the box: Parents’ decontextualized language during preschool years relates to child numeracy and literacy skills in middle childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 236, 105746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105746
Donleavy, G. D., Poli, P. M., Conover, T. L., Albu, C. N., Dahawy, K., Iatridis, G., Kiaptikulwattana, P., Budsaratragoon, P., Klammer, T., Lai, S. C., Trepat, J. N., & Zuelch, H. (2018). How numeracy mediates cash flow format preferences: A worldwide study. International Journal of Management Education, 16(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.004
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Fernández-Pérez, V., Montes-Merino, A., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Galicia, P. E. A. (2019). Emotional competencies and cognitive antecedents in shaping student’s entrepreneurial intention: the moderating role of entrepreneurship education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(1), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0438-7
Foulger, T., Graziano, K., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. (2017). Teacher Educator Technology Competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.
González Bravo, L., Nistor, N., Castro Ramírez, B., Gutiérrez Soto, I., Varas Contreras, M., Núñez Vives, M., & Maldonado Robles, P. (2022). Higher education managers’ perspectives on quality management and technology acceptance: A tale of elders, mediators, and working bees in times of Covid-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 131(December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107236
Gregory, R. J. (2014). Psychology Testing: History, Principle, And Applications, 7th. Allyn and Bacon.
Gregory, Robert J. (2014). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications Boston, MA: Pearson. In Psychological Testing.
Haddad, G., Haddad, G., & Nagpal, G. (2021). Can students’ perception of the diverse learning environment affect their intentions toward entrepreneurship? Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.04.002
Hakkarainen, A., Cordier, R., Parsons, L., Yoon, S., Laine, A., Aunio, P., & Speyer, R. (2023). A systematic review of functional numeracy measures for 9–12 -year-olds: Validity and reliability evidence. International Journal of Educational Research, 119(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102172
Herlo, D. (2017). Connectivism, A New Learning Theory? May 2017, 330–337. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.05.02.41
Hong, J., Thakuriah, P. (Vonu), Mason, P., & Lido, C. (2020). The role of numeracy and financial literacy skills in the relationship between information and communication technology use and travel behaviour. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21(July), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.007
Jayadi, K., Abduh, A., & Basri, M. (2022). A meta-analysis of multicultural education paradigm in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(1), e08828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08828
Kenyon, C., & Hase, S. (2001). Moving from andragogy to heutagogy in vocational education. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA) Conference, 8.
Kirk, G., Knaus, M. J., & Adkin, B. (2023). No time for silence, just repeat after me: A three study perspective on teacher and child interactions over time. International Journal of Educational Research, 120(June), 102209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102209
Leung, E., Adams-Whittaker, J., Sha, K., & Flanagan, T. (2024). Evaluating Canadian pre-service educator programs in response to changing diversity and inclusion needs. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6(October 2023), 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100326
Li, J., Brar, A., & Roihan, N. (2021). The use of digital technology to enhance language and literacy skills for Indigenous people: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Open, 2(March), 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100035
Little, I. D., Koehly, L. M., & Gunter, C. (2022). Understanding changes in genetic literacy over time and in genetic research participants. American Journal of Human Genetics, 109(12), 2141–2151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.11.005
Meeks, L., Kemp, C., & Stephenson, J. (2014). Standards in literacy and numeracy: Contributing factors. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(7), 106–139. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n7.3
Minty-Walker, C., Pettigrew, J., Hunt, L., Rylands, L., & Wilson, N. J. (2023). Nurse education leaders’ perspectives on the teaching of numeracy to undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative research study. Nurse Education in Practice, 72(August), 103754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103754
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism : a new learning theory ? Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1–5.
Sticht, T. G. (2001). The International Literacy Survey: How well does it represent the literacy abilities of adults? Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 15(2), 1–13.
Svensson, H. (2024). Language learning, gender and education: Understanding the agency and affordances of refugee-background women with emergent literacy. Linguistics and Education, 81(November 2023), 101309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101309
Warsono1, H. Y., & Riduwan, A. (2008). Analysis of Educators’ Work Motivation in Supporting Main Tasks of Development and Education Command of Indonesian Navy (Causal Study in Educators Group Kobangdikal, Surabaya). Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education, 2(3), 1–12.
Zhao, M., Dai, Y., Chen, H., & Li, Z. (2024). Financial literacy among Chinese rural households and its impact on stock-market participation. Borsa Istanbul Review, May. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.05.011
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Heny Kudiyanti, Rully Aprilia Zandra, Robby Wijaya, Indra Febrianto, Umniyah Juman Rosyidah, Nawang Kalbuana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.