Communication Experiences of Ugandan Immigrants during Acculturation to the United States A Preliminary Study
Abstract
This study examined the communication experiences of a section of Ugandan immigrants during their acculturation process to the U.S. Kim’s theory of communication cultural adaptation was applied to identify the communication challenges and strategies used in the acculturation process. Ten women and twelve men were interviewed for the study. Four themes emerged: language, superiority and discrimination, self-promotion and aggressiveness, and adaptation and cultural change. The findings indicated that Ugandans have pursued a strategy of cultural integration as opposed to marginalization, assimilation, or separation. The findings can be used to aid both the immigrants and members of the U.S. host culture to better prepare for intercultural communication involving the two cultures. Also, the research breaks the ground for future studies on a wider array of Ugandan and other African immigrant communities whose unique communication experiences during their acculturation in U.S. have been overlooked.
Full text article
References
Andriessen, I., & Phalet, K. (2002). Acculturation and school success: a study among minority youth in the Netherlands. Intercultural Education, 13, 22-36.
Arthur, J. (2000). Invisible sojourners: African Diaspora in the United States. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Berry, J. W. & Sabatier, C. (2010). Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, (3), 191 - 207.
Berry, J. W., & Sam, D. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 291-326). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Callahan, C. (2010). Going home: Deculturation experiences in cultural reentry. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 22. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://www.immi.se/jicc/index.php/jicc/article/view/175/136
Chen, Z. J. (2000). International students' preparation for and adaptation to the American higher education system: A study of cross-cultural communication. World Communication, 29, 26-48.
Connor, J. W. (1977a). Acculturation and the retention of an ethnic identity in three generations of Japanese Americans. San Francisco, CA: R & E Research Associates, Inc.
Connor, J. W. (1977b). Tradition and change in three generations of Japanese American. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Conrad, N. (2009). The effect of character and values on Ugandan adaptation to America. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 16, (3), 99 - 108.
Espenshade, T., & Calhoun, C. (1993). An analysis of public opinion toward undocumented immigration. Population Research & Policy Review, 12, 189 – 224.
Gallois, C., Franklyn-Stokes, A., Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1988). Communication accommodation in intercultural encounters. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication. (pp. 157-185). Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications Ltd.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine Press.
Gordon, A. (1998). The new diaspora-African immigrants to the United States. Journal of Third World Studies, 15, 79 – 103.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (4:th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Hansen, H., & Twaddle, M. (1988). Introduction. In H. Hansen & M. Twaddle (Eds.). Uganda now: Between decay and development (pp. 1- 25) London: James Currey Ltd.
Kaduuli, S. (2008). Poverty and migration: The Ugandan experience. Retrieved June 12, 2010 from http://www.un-instraw.org/images/files/Poverty%20and%20Migration.pdf
Kim. Y. Y. (1978). A communication approach to the acculturation process: A study of Korean immigrants in Chicago. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2, 197-224.
Kim, Y. Y. (1988). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Kim, Y. Y. (1995). Cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 170-193). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Kosic, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Pierre, A., & Mannetti, L. (2004). The social cognition of immigrants’ acculturation: Effects of the need for closure and the reference group at entry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 796-813.
Kreps, L. G., Herndon, S., & Arneson, P. (1993). Introduction: The power of qualitative research to address organizational issues. In S. L. Herndon & G. L. Kreps (Eds.), Qualitative research: Applications in organizational communication (pp. 1-18). Creeskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Marino, R., Stuart, G. W., & Minas, I. H. (2000). Acculturation of values and behavior: A study of Vietnamese immigrants. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 33, 21-42.
Mazrui, A. (2002). Brain drain between counterterrorism and globalization. African Issues, 30, (1), 86-89.
McDonald, K., Vinson, B., Jayaram, L., & Vickery, K. (2008). Contemporary racio-ethnic relations in the African diaspora. Paper prepared for Historical Society’s 2008 Conference Migration, Diaspora, Ethnicity, & Nationalism in History. Retrieved on June 4, 2010 from http://www.bu.edu/historic/conference08/mcdonaldvinson.pdf
Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D., & Berry, J. W. (1996). Ecology, acculturation, and psychological adaptation: A study of Adivasis in Bihar. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nesbitt, N. (2003). African intellectuals in the belly of the beast: Migration, identity, and the politics of exile. Critical Arts: A South-North Journal of Cultural & Media Studies,17(1/2), 17- 35.
Owen, W. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70 (3), 274-287.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. J. (1936). A memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 149-52.
Rosenthal, D. A., & Feldman, S. S. (1989). The acculturation of Chinese immigrants: Perceived effects on family functioning of length of residence
in two cultural contexts. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 151(4), 495-514.
Takougang, J. (2003). Contemporary African immigration to the U.S.. Irikerindo: A Journal of African Migration, 2. Retrieved June 12, 2010 from http://www.africamigration.com/archive_02/j_takougang.htm
Tanno, D. V., & Jandt, F. E. (2002). Redefining the “Other” in multicultural research. In M. J. N. Nakayama & T. K. L. A. Flores, (Eds.), Readings in intercultural communication: Experiences and contexts (pp. 378-385). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
The Ugandan Diaspora Team (2011). Ugandan diaspora social networking event 2011. Retrieved from http://www.ugandandiaspora.com/ugandan-diaspora-social-networking-event-2011
Uganda North American Association (UNAA). (2011). Who we are. Retrieved from http://www.unaa.org/ United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. (2006). International migration. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/2006Migration_Chart/2006IttMig_chart.htm Weinstock, S. A. (1969). Acculturation and occupation: A study of the 1956
Hungarian refugees in the United States. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff
World Bank. 2011. Migration and Remittances Factbook 2011, World Bank: Washington, DC
Authors
Copyright (c) 2012 Samuel Muwanguzi, George W. Musambira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.