A Corpus-Driven Study of Syntactic And Semantic Models of Transitivized English Intransitive Verbs
Abstract
Transitivized English intransitive verbs, abbreviated as transitivized EIVs in the present study, refer to the English intransitive verbs which are transitively used taking direct objects as normal transitive verbs do. This study aims to systematically explore their syntactic and semantic patterns through a specialized corpus with 585 instances of 211 transitivized EIVs from the EIV corpus and approximately 97,000 words from the instances of 210 transitivized EIVs from the Corpus of Contemporary American English. To code the syntactic and semantic patterns of transitivized EIVs, conventional lexical and phrasal categories as well as the Ideal Motion Event Category were employed. The results of investigation indicate that the transitivized EIVs feature three major syntactic patterns: “EIVs + NP/Pron. + Zero”, “EIVs + NP/Pron. + meaning-supplementing expressions” and “EIVs + one’s way + Prep.-Phr.” while their semantic patterns are governed by law: The basic semantic pattern of the transitivized EIVs is the cause sense, but with its weakening or backgrounding, the other semantic patterns take the stage involving the sense combination of cause and manner, the sense of manner or the sense of abstract motion. This study offers a relatively comprehensive landscape of the linguistic phenomenon of transitivized EIVs and is believed capable of facilitating a better understanding of EIVs, thereby flexible and appropriate use of EIVs in intercultural communication.
Full text article
References
Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275-311. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib
Boas, H. C. (2003). A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, X. (2017). A linguistic memetic account to lexico-grammatical innovations: A case study of the "causa-tivization" of English unergative verbs. Foreign Language Education, 38(2), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2017.03.005
Choi, J. (2019). Overpassivization of English unaccusatives revisited: A look behind the scenes. Korean Jour-nal of English Language and Linguistics, 19(3), 407-431. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.19.3.201909.407
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexi-ties. New York: Basic Books.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gu, X. (1981). Inter-conversion between transitive and intransitive verbs of English. Shandong Foreign Lan-guage Teaching, 2, 16-21.
Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Jones, M. (1988). Cognate objects and the case filter. Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011579
Ju, M. K. (2000). Overpassivization errors by second language learners: The effect of conceptualizable agents in discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 85-111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100001042
Han, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Causative use of English intransitive agentive verbs. Foreign Language Education, 4, 6-10. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2016.04.002
Haspelmath, M. (2001). Word classes and parts of speech. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Be-havioral Sciences (pp. 16538-16545). https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02959-4
Hubard, P. L. (1994). Non-transformational theories of grammar: Implications for language teaching. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 49-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1988). A usage-based model. In B. Rugida-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127-161). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2. Practical applications. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2000). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cam-bridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kipper, K., Korhonen, A., Ryant, N., & Palmer, M. (2008). A large-scale classification of English verbs. Lan-guage Resources & Evaluation, 42, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-007-9048-2
Korhonen, A., & Briscoe, T. (2004). Extended lexical-semantic classification of English verbs. Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics. Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.3115/1596431.1596437
Kuno, S., & Takami, K. (2004). Functional constraints in grammar: On the unergative-unaccusative distinc-tion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Massam, D. (1990). Cognate objects as thematic objects. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 35(2), 161-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100013566
Mahdun, M., Chan, M. Y., Yap, N. T., Wong, B. E., & Kasim, Z. M. (2023). Overpassivisation in L2 acqui-sition: An examination of L1 Malay ESL tertiary students' passivisation of intransitive verbs in Eng-lish. Peranika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 31(3), 995-1013. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.3.05
Moltmann, F. (1989). Nominal and clausal event predicates. Proceedings of the Regional Meeting of the Chi-cago Linguistics Society (CLS), 25, 300-314.
Montrul, S. (1999). Causative errors with unaccusative verbs in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 15(2), 191-219. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765899669832752
Nakajima, H. (2006). Adverbial cognate objects. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(4), 674-684. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.674
Okada, M. (2021). Error analysis of passivized sentences made by Japanese high school students: A voice pro-duction task. LET Journal of Central Japan, 31, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.20656/letcj.31.0_53
Oshita, H. (1997). 'The Unaccusative Trap': L2 acquisition of English intransitive verbs. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Oshita, H. (2000). What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of 'passive' unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research, 16(4), 293-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830001600401
Pereltsvaig, A. (2001). Cognate objects in modern and biblical Hebrew. In J. Ouhalla & U. Shlonsky (Eds.), Themes and issues in Arabic and Hebrew (pp. 1-31). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rice, S. (1988). Unlikely lexical entries. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Lin-guistics Society (pp. 202-212). https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1797
Richards, J. C. (1973). A noncontrastive approach to error analysis. In J. W. Oller Jr. & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Focus on the learner: Pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher (pp. 96-113). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Rosen, S. T. (1996). Events and verb classification. Linguistics, 34(2), 191-223. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.2.191
Shen, Z. (1979). The inter-conversion between transitive and intransitive verbs of English. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2, 52-65.
Sweet, H. (1891). A new English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. A. Shopen (Ed.), Lan-guage typology and syntactic description (Vol. III, pp. 57-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Typology and process in concept structuring, Volume II. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wang, W., & Luo, S. (2016). Semantic typology and cognitive construal of modifiers in English cognate ob-ject constructions. Foreign Language and Literature Studies, 33(4), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.19716/j.1672-4720.2016.04.007
Wang, R., & Chen, H. (2014). A corpus-based study of the relationship between verbs and constructions: The conventionalization of transitive sneeze. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly), 1, 19-31.
Wu, X., Xiao, K., Wang, M., & Yang, L. (2023). A corpus-driven study of lexicalization models of English intransitive verbs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, e1059516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059516
Yip, V. (1995). Interlanguage and learnability: From Chinese to English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zhu, X., & Wang, T. (2016). Transitivity of intransitive verbs in Chinese EFL learners' English. Foreign Lan-guages and Their Teaching, 3, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004260
Zhu, X. (2021). An event structure analysis of intransitives' syntactic expressions of English and Chinese. For-eign Language Education, 42(4), 20-24+49. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2021.04.004
Zibin, A., & Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2021). Blood metaphors and metonymies in Jordanian Arabic and Eng-lish. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00075.zib
Zou, K. (1984). The features and significance of the inter-conversion between transitive and intransitive verbs of English. Modern Foreign Languages, 4, 29-15.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Xiaofang Wu, Kunxue Xiao (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
Article Details
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Anhui Provincial Department of Education
Grant numbers (2022AH051083) and (SK2019A0457)