Analysis of Gender Discourse Bias and Gender Discrimination in Social Media: A Case Study of the TikTok Platform
Abstract
In the contemporary landscape of new media, social media platforms, particularly exemplified by TikTok, offer female users accessible and cost-effective means for self-expression and communication. However, this study reveals that such platforms, despite their apparent openness and liberality, have not effectively challenged or changed the persistent and deep-rooted issue of gender discrimination that women face. This research adopts a qualitative content analysis and specifically focuses on the TikTok platform, where female users frequently encounter various forms of gender discourse bias and discrimination. The findings suggest that female users on TikTok often face stigmatization through the internet lexicon and the commodification of physical appearance, reflecting broader societal issues of gender inequality and objectification. Simultaneously, a segment of the female user base on TikTok is actively engaging in challenging and negotiating these entrenched stereotypes, striving to redefine their representation in the digital space. Furthermore, the research highlights how the anonymity of the internet, the media’s role in encoding and perpetuating gender stereotypes, and the consumerist traps set by capitalist market dynamics, collectively contribute to an illusory facade of gender equality. This facade obscures the underlying realities of discourse bias and gender discrimination that persist in the digital realm.
Full text article
References
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Balamurali, E., Hariharasudan, A., & Gnanamuthu, M. T. (2023). Women in society through the aspect of language. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(1), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i1.149
Ceci, L. (2024). Distribution of TikTok users worldwide as of January 2024, by gender. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299785/distribution-tiktok-users-gender/#statisticContainer
Curry, D. (2024). TikTok App Report 2024. Business of Apps. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/tiktok-report/?utm_source=tiktok&utm_medium=click&utm_campaign=Hyperlink+report#stripe-edd-window
Foucault, M. (2019). The history of sexuality: 1: the will to knowledge. Penguin UK.
Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the 'sexualization of culture' debates. Sex roles, 66, 736-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x
Lee, J., & Abidin, C. (2023). Introduction to the Special Issue of "TikTok and Social Movements". Social Media Society, 9(1), 20563051231157452. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157452
Li, J., Adnan, H. M., & Gong, J. (2023). Exploring Cultural Meaning Construction in Social Media: An Analysis of Liziqi's YouTube Channel. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(4), 01-12. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i4.237
Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., Krishnan, M., Ellingrud, K., & Yee, L. (2019). The future of women at work.
Miaozhen. (2018). 2018 TikTok Data Report. https://wenku.baidu.com, 2018-08.
Ryu, S. (2022). ByteDance: TikTok and Douyin in Online Streaming Wars. SAGE Publications: SAGE Business Cases Originals. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529795905
Sachs, J., Wise, R., & Karell, D. (2021). The TikTok self: Music, Signaling, And Identity On Social Media. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2rx46
Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653
Stahl, C. C., & Literat, I. (2023). # GenZ on TikTok: the collective online self-portrait of the social media generation. Journal of Youth Studies, 26(7), 925-946. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2053671
Su, W., Han, X., Jin, C., Yan, Y., & Potenza, M. N. (2019). Are males more likely to be addicted to the internet than females? A meta-analysis involving 34 global jurisdictions. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.021
TikTok. (2020). How TikTok Recommends Videos #ForYou. TikTok Transparency Center. Retrieved 18.06 from https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/how-tiktok-recommends-videos-for-you
Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & Ten Klooster, P. M. (2015). Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis of Internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income. Telematics and informatics, 32(2), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.003
Wang, F. (2021). Research On The Communication And Interactive Behaviour Of Douyin Short Video Users From The Perspective Of Meme Theory [Master, InnerMongolian University].
Wegener, C., Jage-D'Aprile, F., & Plumeier, L. (2023). Motherhood in social media: phenomena and consequences of the professionalization of mothers and their media (self-)representation. Feminist Media Studies, 23(7), 3222-3238. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2108479
Woelke, J., & Koch, S. (2016). Personal Influence. The Part Played by the People in the Flow of Mass Communication: von Elihu Katz und Paul Felix Lazarsfeld (1955). Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_6
Wu, Y., & Zhang, A. (2019). Listening to Her: A Study on Women's Expressive Styles Report. Chinese Women, https://img203.kttx.cn/images/files/fd37bc4afc7041af93659f8bb15a3c8f.pdf
Zeng, S. (2023). Chinese female representation on short video applications and their perception: Douyin (TikTok) as a Case Study.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Qingxia Yin, Karmilah Binti Binti Abdullah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.