Politeness in Intercultural Email Communication: Australian and Korean Perspectives
Abstract
This paper presents initial results from analysis of data collected on the topic of politeness in intercultural email communication from a large cohort of Australian academic and general staff at an established metropolitan university. We were interested in the language used by these staff members while they conducted their initial email communication with their contacts overseas. The contacts overseas were, for example, fellow professional colleagues, representatives from educational institutions and foreign students. The staff members did not know personally their overseas email partners in the sense that they had not previously met face-to-face. In particular, we were interested in if and how the staff members incorporated politeness indicators in their email language and how they interpreted politeness, or lack thereof, in their incoming emails. The paper also describes and analyses the politeness strategies in intercultural emails used by a smaller cohort of Korean academics at seven universities in Korea. Results show differences in politeness, both in expectations and use, between Australian and Korean academics.
Themes and conceptual developments were identified in the primary data-gathering instrument, the questionnaire, using qualitative data analysis. The software package Leximancer was used for text analysis (Smith 2002). The software analysis confirms and strengthens our own qualitative analysis. Results show aspects such as formality in language and use of correct titles are important politeness considerations in intercultural email communication. These politeness considerations however, vary according to culture and results show many discrepancies on these and other aspects between the Australian and Korean data. Figures showing ranked themes display these results visually.
Full text article
References
Baron, N. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language and Communication, 18, 133-170.
Baron, N. (2001). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London: Routledge.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bunz, U., & Cambell, S. W. (2002, October). Accommodating politeness indicators in personal electronic mail messages. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers 3rd Annual Conference, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N. (1997). Triangulation in educational research. In J. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 318-322). Oxford: Pergamon.
Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 219-236.
Gains, J. (1999). Electronic mail - a new style of communication or just a new medium?: An investigation into the text features of email. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 81-101.
Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1994). Social impacts of electronic mail in organisations: A review of the research literature. Communication Yearbook, 18, 434 - 453.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Holmes, M. E. (1994). Don't blink or you'll miss it: Issues in electronic mail research. Communication Yearbook, 18, 454-463.
Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J. (1990). Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 719-729.
Lakoff, R. (1989). The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua, 8(2/3), 101-129.
Lakoff, R. (1990). Talking power: The politics of language in our lives. New York: BasicBooks: A Division of HarperCollins Publishers.
Lan, L. (2000). Email style: Rebelling against Standard English? Australian Style, 8(2), 1-4.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Ma, R. (1996). Computer-mediated conversations as a new dimension of intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college students. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. (pp. 173-185). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Company.
Moran, C., & Hawisher, G. (1998). The rhetorics and languages of electronic mail. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era. London: Routledge.
Murphy, M. (2006). Towards a Practical Approach for Assessing Politeness in Intercultural Email Communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Griffith University, Australia.
Ross, D. N. (2001). Electronic communications: Do cultural dimensions matter? American Business Review, 19(2), 75-81.
Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The ethnography of communication: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Simmons, T. (1994). Politeness theory in computer mediated communication: Face threatening acts in a 'faceless' medium. (ERIC document Reproduction Service No. ED381005)
Smith, A. E. (2002). Leximancer. Retrieved May 3, 2003 from ttp://www.leximancer.com
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213 - 235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). Face and facework: An introduction. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues (pp. 1-14). New York: State University of New York Press.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 211-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Walther, J. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction. Communication Research, 19(1), 52 - 90.
Walther, J. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23(3), 342 -369.
Watts, R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2006 Margaret Murphy, Mike Levy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.