Re-imaging Understanding of Intercultural Communication, Culture and Culturing
Abstract
The paper examines intercultural communication as the management of messages across cultures. Our understanding of culture, culturing, and intercultural communication enlarges our understanding of what being human means and, moreover, expands moral action by locating our humanity within a constantly changing world. This emergent quantum understanding brings a closer look on intercultural theory and the phenomenon of culturing, thus, broadening human understanding of intercultural communication.
Full text article
References
Arnett, R. C. (1986), Communication and community: Implications of Martin’s Buber dialogue, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Arthos, J. (2000), Who are we and who am I? Gadamer's communal ontology as palimpsest,Communication Studies, 51, 15-34.
Bateson, M. C. (1994), Peripheral visions, New York: HarperCollins.
Belay, G. (1993), Toward a paradigm shift for intercultural and international communication: New research directions, Communication Yearbook, 16, 437-457.
Buber, M. (1994), Genuine dialogue and the possibilities of peace, In R. Anderson, K. Cissna, & R. Arnett (Eds.) The reach of dialogue: confirmation, voice, and community (pp. 306-312). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Capra, F. (1983), The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. New York: Bantam Books.
Casmir, F. L. (1993), Third-culture building: A paradigm shift for international and intercultural communicatio Communication Yearbook, 16, 407-428.
Chen, G., & Starosta, W. J. (1996), Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis, Communication Yearbook. 19, 353-383.
Deetz, S. (1995), Transforming communication transforming business, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Dervin, B. (1991), Comparative theory reconceptualized: From entities and states to processesand dynamics, Communication Theory, 1, 59-69.
Freire, P. (1993), Pedagogy of the oppressed, New York: Continuum.
Gribbin, J. (1984). In search of Schroedinger’s cat: Quantum Physics and reality, New York: Bantam Books.
Herbert, N. (1987), Quantum reality: Beyond the new physics, New York: Anchor Books.
Lee, W. S., Wang, J., Chung, J., & Hertel, E. (1995), A sociohistorical approach to intercultural communication, Howard Journal of Communications, 6 , 262-291.
Martin, J., & Nakayama, T. K. (1999), Thinking dialectically about culture and communication, Communication Theory, 9, 1-25.
McPhail, M. L. (1996), Zen in the art of rhetoric, New York: State University of New York Press.
Moon, D. G. (1996), Concepts of culture: Implications for intercultural communication research, Communication Quarterly, 44, 70-84.
Olmsted, A. P. (1998), Words are acts: Critical race theory as a rhetorical construct, Howard Journal of Communications, 9, 323-332.
Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997), Moral conflict: When social worlds collide, Thousands Oak, CA: Sage.
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984), Order out of chaos, New York: Bantam Books.
Rodriguez, A. (2002), Diversity as liberation (II): Introducing a new understanding of diversity, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Said, E. (2001, 16 September), Islam and the West are inadequate banners,(http://www.observer.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,552764,00.html)
Seeger, M, et.a.l, (1998), Communication, organization, and crisis, Communication Yearbook, 21, 231-275.
Shutter, R. (1993), On third-culture building, Communication Yearbook, 16, 429-436.
Starosta, W. (1991, May), Third culture building: Chronological development and the role of third parties, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
Weinberg, S. (2001, May 31), Can science explain everything? Anything?, The New York Review of Books, pp. 1-9.
Witte, K., et.al., (1996), Bringing order to chaos: A health communication model, Communication Studies, 47, 229-242.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2008 Natasa Bakic-Miric
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.