You Think I am Stupid? Face Needs in Intercultural Conflicts
Abstract
Embedded in intercultural conflicts are identity or face-based goal issues (Rothman, 1997), which, when not effectively managed, may lead to unresolved conflicts. This study examined actual email interactions over a period of five months between an American visiting professor and an International Office staff member at a University in China. It showed three patterns of interaction that failed to manage each other’s face or identity needs and led to unresolved conflicts, hurt feelings, and ruined intercultural relationships. It suggested principles or lessons for effectively handling intercultural conflicts.
Full text article
References
Adler, R., Rosenfeld, L., & Proctor, R. (2004). Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication (9th). Oxford Univ. Press.
Berry, J. (1998). Intercultural relations in plural societies. Canadian Psychology, 40 (1), 12-21.
Bond, M. (1991). Beyond the Chinese face. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Brown, B. (1977). Face-saving and face-restoration in negotiation. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social-psychological perspectives (pp. 275-299). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cai, D. A., & Fink, E. L. (2002). Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists. Communication Monographs, 69, 67-87.
Cocroft, B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). Facework in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(4), 469-506.
Cupach, W., & Imahori, T. (1993). Identity management theory: Communication competence in intercultural episodes and relationships. In R. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 112-131). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gao, G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1998). Communicating effectively with the Chinese. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gass, R. H. & Seiter, J. S. (2007). Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining (3rd). Pearson Education, Inc.
Goffman, E. (1967), Interaction Ritual: Essays in face-to-face interaction. Chicago: Aldine.
Hall, B. ‘J’. (2005). Among cultures: The challenge of communication (2nd). Thomson: Wadsworth.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16.
Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese concept of "face". American Anthropology, 46, 45-64.
Imahori, T. T., & Cupach, W. R. (2005). Identity management theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theories about intercultural communication (pp. 195-210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, Y. Y. (1997). Adapting to a new culture. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (8th ed.) (pp. 404-417).
Kim, Y. Y. (2002). Cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In Martin, J., Nakayama, T., & Flores, L. (Eds.), Readings in intercultural communication: Experiences and contexts (pp.235-245). McGraw-Hill.
Oetzel, J. G. (1998). The effects of self-construals and ethnicity on self-reported conflict styles. Communication Reports, 11, 133-144.
Oetzel, J. G., Myers, K., Meares, M., & Lara, E. (2003). Interpersonal conflict in organizations: Explaining conflict styles via face-negotiation theory. Communication Research Reports, 20, 105-155.
Oetzel, J. G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face-negotiation theory. Communication Research, 30(6), 599-624.
Oetzel, J. G., Ting-Toomey, S., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X., Takai, J., & Wilcox, R. (2001). Face behaviors in interpersonal conflicts: A cross-cultural comparison of Germany, Japan, China, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 68, 235-258.
Oetzel, J. G., Ting-Toomey, S., Yokochi, Y., Masumoto, T., & Taki, J. (2000). A typology of facework behaviors in conflicts with best friends and relative strangers. Communication Quarterly, 48, 397-419.
Rothman, J. (1997). Resolving identity-based conflict in nations, organizations, and communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rothwell, J.D. (2007). In mixed company: Communicating in small groups and teams. Thomson: Wadsworth.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1994a). Managing conflict in intimate intercultural relationships. In D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimate conflict in personal relationships (pp. 47-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1994b). Managing intercultural conflicts effectively. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (7th) (pp. 360-372). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). An updated face-negotiation theory. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71-92). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Cole, M. (1990). Intergroup diplomatic communication: A face-negotiation perspective. In F. Korzenny & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Communicating for peace: Diplomacy and negotiation across cultures (pp. 77-95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford.
Wilmot, W., & Hocker, J. (1998). Interpersonal conflict (5th). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2011 Yanrong Chang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.