A comparative study of the utility of new media technologies and power distance in doctor-patient communication in the Philippines and the United States
Abstract
This study’s purpose was to examine the role of power distance in physicians’ desired impression by patients, as well as doctors’ attitudes toward utilizing new media technologies. Qualitative interviews were conducted in the United States and the Philippines - which have divergent power distance scores. Results revealed three major themes. First, power distance was manifested in how each country’s doctors wanted to be perceived by patients. The second theme was that doctors perceived today’s patients to be more informed than in the past; however, Philippine doctors viewed this as a challenge while U.S. doctors viewed it as an opportunity to initiate conversation. The third theme identified differences in litigation concerns, which influenced attitudes toward using new media technologies in their practice.
Full text article
References
, November 2) Healthcare alternative for Filipinos. ManilaTimes. http://www.manilatimes.net/index.php/health-news/34854-healthcare-alternative-for-filipinos
Akindele, D., & Trennepohl, B. (2008). Breaking the Culture of Silence: Teaching Writing and Oral Presentation Skills to Botswana University Students. Language Culture and Curriculum, 21(2), 154-166.
Altshler, L., Sussman, N., & Kachur, E. (2003). Assessing changes in intercultural sensitivity among physician trainees using the intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 387-401.
Anderson, J, Rainey, M., & Eysenbach, G. (2003). The impact of cyberhealthcare on the physician-patient relationship. Journal of Medical Systems, 27(1), 67-84.
Azfar, O., & Gurgur, T. (2008). Does corruption affect health outcomes in the Philippines? Economics of Governance, 9(3), 197-244.
Bagnara S., Parlangeli O., & Tartaglia R. (2010). Are hospitals becoming high reliability organizations? Applied Ergonomics, 41, 713-718.
Boulos, K., & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24(1), 2-23.
Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2010). GLOBE practices and values: A case of diminishing marginal utility&quest. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1316-1324.
Brough, F., Costanza-Chock, M., Garces, S., et al. (2009). Mobile voices: A mobile, open source, popular communication platform for first-generation immigrants in Los Angeles. Presented at the International Communication Association Conference in Chicago Illinois. http://www.lirneasia.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/final-paper_bar_et_al.pdf
Brown, J., & Walsh-Childers, K. (2002). Effects of media on personal and public health. Media effects: Advances in Theory and Research, 2, 453-488.
Buenting, D. (2006). Audience involvement with Yellow Card, an entertainment-education initiative promoting safe-sex behavior among African youth, Soul City Institute.
Cáceres Zapatero, M., Brändle, G., & San-Ruiz Roman, J. (2013). Interpersonal communication in the web 2.0: The relations of young people with strangers. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 68, 436-456.
Cegala, D. J. (2011). An exploration of factors promoting patient participation in primary care medical interviews. Health communication, 26(5), 427-436.
Chan-Olmsted, S. M., & Ha, L. S. (2003). Internet business models for broadcasters: How television stations perceive and integrate the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(4), 597-617.
Collins, T., Clark, J., Petersen, L., & Kressin, N. (2002). Racial differences in how patients perceive physician communication regarding cardiac testing. Med Care, 40(1), 27-34.
Couchman G., Forjuoh S., & Rascoe T. (2001). E-mail communications in family practice: what do patients expect? Journal of Family Practice, 50, 414-418.
Deaton, A. (2004). Health in an age of globalization. http://www.princeton.edu/rpds/papers/pdfs/deaton_healthglobalage.pdf
Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31, 31-58.
Dysart-Gale, D. (2006). Cultural sensitivity beyond ethnicity: A universal precautions model. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 4(1).
Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Jama, 267(16), 2221-2226.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Galanti, G. A. (2008). Caring for patients from different cultures (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gallan, A. S., Jarvis, C. B., Brown, S. W., & Bitner, M. J. (2013). Customer positivity and participation in services: an empirical test in a health care context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(3), 338-356.
Gao, G., Burke, N., Somkin, C., & Pasick, R. (2009). Considering culture in physician–patient communication during colorectal cancer screening. Qualitative Health Research, 19(6). 778-789.
Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2005). National culture and human resource management: assumptions and evidence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(6), 971-986.
Glynn, L. & Scully, R. (2010). The edge of chaos: Reductionism in healthcare and health professional training. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 64(6), 669-672).
Ha, L. & James, L. (1998). Interactivity re-examined: A baseline analysis of early business websites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42(4),457–474.
Haean, O., Ray, M., & Allegrante, J. (2008). Perceptions of health care provider communication activity among American cancer survivors and adults without cancer histories: An analysis of the 2003 Health Information Trends Survey (HINTS) data. Journal of Health Communication, 13(7), 637-653.
Herrera, D., Novick, Dl, Jan, D., & Traum, D. (2011). Dialog behaviors across culture and group size. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, 6766, 450-459.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1), 8.
Hofstede, G. & Bond, M. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 4-21.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (3:rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hong, T. (2006). Contributing factors to the use of health-related websites. Journal of Health Communication, 11(2), 149-165.
Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21:st century. An occasional paper on digital media and learning. John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
Kreuter, M. W., Chheda, S. G., & Bull, F. C. (2000). How does physician advice influence patient behavior?: Evidence for a priming effect. Archives of family medicine, 9(5), 426.
Lin, J. & Cho, C. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of cross-media usage: A study of a TV program’s official web site. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), 316-336.
Longtin, Y., Sax, H., Leape, L. L., Sheridan, S. E., Donaldson, L., & Pittet, D. (2010, January). Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 53-62). Elsevier
McMillan, S. (2002). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 163–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McMillan, S., & Macias, W. (2008). Strengthening the safety net for online seniors: Factors influencing differences in health information seeking among older Internet users. Journal of Health Communication, 13(8), 778.
McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith-a failure of analysis. Human relations, 55(1), 89-118.
Meeuwesen, L., van den Brink-Muinen, A., & Hofstede, G. (2009). Can dimensions of national culture predict cross-national differences in medical communication?. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(1), 58-66.
Mello, M., Powlowski, M., Nañagas, J., & Bossert, T. (2006). The role of law in public health: The case of family planning in the Philippines. Social Science & Medicine, 63(2), 384-396.
Merkin, R. S. (2006). Power distance and facework strategies. Journal of intercultural communication research, 35(2), 139-160.
National Cancer Institute. (2001). Making health communication programs work. Bethesda, MD.
Neuhauser, L., & Kreps, G. L. (2010). eHealth communication and behavior change: promise and performance. Social Semiotics, 20(1), 9-27.
Oh, K. & Yoon, Y. (2012). March 14, 2012 http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrs/research/upload/Round-1-Oh-and-Yoon.pdf
O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications and Strategies, 65, 17-37.
Oyserman, D. (2006). High power, low power, and equality: Culture beyond individualism and collectivism.
Paunkoviċ, J., Jovanoviċ, R., Stojkoviċ, Z., & Stojkoviċ, I. (2010). Sustainable implementation of Information and Communication Technology in health care–a case study of organizational and cultural factors. Sibiu Alma Mater University Journals. Series A. Economic Sciences, 3(3), 1-8.
Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2012). What Facebook and Twitter mean for news. http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/mobile-devices-and-news-consumption-some-good-signs-for-journalism/what-facebook-and-twitter-mean-for-news/
Poland, B., Lehoux, P., Holmes, D., & Andrews, G. (2005). How place matters: unpacking technology and power in health and social care. Health & Social Care in the Community, 13(2), 170-180.
Rosell-Ubial, P.J.B. (2008). The state of the Philippine health care system. Philippine Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 37(2), 53-56.
Roter, D., & Hall, J. (2006). Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: Improving communication in medical visits. Praeger.
Ryan, J., & Sysko, J. (2007). The contingency of patient preferences for involvement in health decision making. Health Care Management Review, 32(1), 30-36.
Say, R., Murtagh, M., & Thomson, R. (2006). Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: A narrative review. Patient Education and Counseling, 60(2),102-114.
Searcey, D. & Goldstein, J. (2009). Tangible and unseen health-care costs.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125193312967181349.html
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Shirky, C. (2011). Political power of social media-technology, the public sphere and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90, 28.
Sison, A. J. G., & Palma-Angeles, A. (1997). Business ethics in the Philippines. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(14), 1519-1528.
Turow, J. (2007). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. University of Chicago Press.
Vaughan, C. M. (2011). A picture of health: participation, photovoice and preventing HIV among Papua New Guinean youth (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)).
Warner, D. A. & Procaccino, J. D. (2007). Women seeking health information: Distinguishing the web user. Journal of Health Communication, 12 (8), 787-814.
Weisbrod, B. A. (1991). The health care quadrilemma: an essay on technological change, insurance, quality of care, and cost containment. Journal of economic literature, 523-552.
Wirtz, B., Schilke, O., & Ullrich, S. (2011). Strategic development of business models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for creating value on the Internet. Long Range Planning, 1-19.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2015 Bessie Lawton, Meghan Mahoney, Lukas Pelliccio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.