Towards a theoretical framework of intercultural communication ethics in the Arab Gulf culture The perspectives of global public relations practitioners in Bahrain
Abstract
This research investigates the perspectives of global public relations practitioners in the governmental sector in Bahrain. Sixteen qualitative interviews were conducted to provide in-depth theoretical understanding of the intercultural communication ethics in the Arab Gulf. The researcher used the theoretical framework of Hofstede (1984; 1994) to analyze the data. The research reveals that an Arab framework of intercultural communication ethics should address the society’s dilemma between modernization and Arabic/Islamic traditional values. The research provides a proposed framework that consists of “revealed” and “avoided” processes of communication. This framework is based on Arabic relational values of openness, awareness of diversity, power hierarchy, loyalty to collective culture, motivation to achieve individual goals, respect to woman and motivation to develop uncertainty-avoidance strategies.
Full text article
References
Al Jassaney, E. H. (1982). Oil, Economic & Social Development in the Arab Gulf States (Arabic). Kuwait, Dar El Maarafah.
Al-Rasheed, R. A. (2017). Parliamentary Diplomacy: Objectives, Mechanisms and Roles: A Case Study of the Bahraini Parliamentary Council (Arabic). Bahrain Institute for Political Development, Bahrain.
AlSaqer, L. (2016). History and Sociology of Public Communication in the Arab Gulf. Cross-cultural Communication, 12 (3), 1-13.
Al-Sultan, M. F. A. (2012). Mediation is a major tool in the implementation of the Kuwaiti and Arab foreign policy (Arabic). Masters dissertation. Middle East University. Jordon.
Bahrain Economy (n.d.). (Arabic) Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2I3Lvp5
Central Department of Statistics and Information (CDSI) (2015). Human Resources Indicators, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Arabic). Retrieved from: www.cdsi.gov.sa/english/index.php?
Daymon, C. & Holloway, I. (2002). Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing communications, London, Routledge.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Introduction: Enlarging the Field of Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds) The Landscape of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1-40.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
Hofstede, G. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), pp. 389-398.
Hofstede, G. (1994). Cultures and Organizations: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. London: Harper Collins Publishers.
Huang, Y. H. (2000). The personal influence model and Gao Guanxi in Taiwan Chinese public relations. Public Relations Review, 26, 216–239.
Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2000). Public relations in strategic management and strategic management of public relations: Theory and evidence from the IABC Excellence project, Journalism Studies, 1(2), 303-321.
Kent, M., & Taylor, M. (2011). How intercultural communication theory informs public relations practice in global settings. Public relations in global cultural contexts: Multiparadigmatic perspectives, 50-76.
Ki, E. J., & Ye, L. (2017). An assessment of progress in research on global public relations from 2001 to 2014. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 235-245.
Kim, J. (2016). Public relations and public diplomacy in cultural and educational exchange programs: A coorientational approach to the Humphrey Program. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 135-145.
Koyame-Marsh, R. O. (2017). The Dichotomy Between the Saudi Women's Education and Economic Participation. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(1), 431-441.
Lee, B. K. (2004). Corporate image examined in a Chinese-based context: A study of a young educated public in Hong Kong? Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(1), 1–34.
L'Etang, J. (2009). Public relations and diplomacy in a globalized world: An issue of public communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 607-626.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Low, Y. S.-Y., Varughese, J., & Pang, A. (2011). Communicating crisis: How culture influences image repair in Western and Asian governments. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(3), 218–242.
Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (1999). Thinking dialectically about culture and communication. Communication Theory, 9(1), 1-25.
Ministry of Information Affairs (2018). Retrieved from: http://www.mia.gov.bh/en/Kingdom-of-Bahrain/Pages/Population-and-Demographic Growth.aspx
Mogensen, K. (2017). From public relations to corporate public diplomacy. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 605-614.
Mohammed, O. A. (2012). The Protocol of the Foreign Policies of the Islamic Countries in accordance with the Vienna Agreement, applying to the Sudanese sovereign institutions during the period from 2005 to 2011 (Arabic). Masters dissertation. Islamic Um Darman University. Sudan.
Rhee, Y. (1999). Confucian culture and excellent public relations: A study of generic principles and specific applications in South Korean public relations practice. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland,College Park.
Sallot, L. M., Ling, J. L., Acosta-Alzuru, C., & Jones, K. O. (2003). From aardvark to zebra: A new millennium analysis of theory development in public relations academic journals. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(1), 27–90.
Schwandt, T. A. (1998). Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds) The Landscape of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 221-259.
Signitzer, B. (2008). Public relations and public diplomacy: Some conceptual explorations. In A. Zerfass, B. van Ruler, & K. Sriramesh (Eds.), Public relations research: European andinternational perspectives (pp. 205–218). Wiesbaden: Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaft.
Signitzer, B., & Wamser, C. (2006). Public diplomacy: A specific governmental public relations function. In C. Botan & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 435–464). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sriramesh, K. (1999). The models of public relations in India. Top Faculty Paper presented to the PR Division, AEJMC, August 4–7, New Orleans, LA.
Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (Eds.). (2003). The Global Public Relations Handbook: Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge.
Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (Eds.). (2009). The Global Public Relations Handbook Revised Edition. Theory, Research and Practice. Mahwah/New Jersey.
Sriramesh, K., Kim, Y., & Takasaki, M. (1999). Public relations in three Asian cultures: An analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(4), 271–292.
Supreme Council of Women. (2015). Bahraini Woman in Numbers. Retrieved from: https://www.scw.bh/en/AboutCouncil/Pages/record2016.aspx
Szondi, G. (2009). International context of public relations. In R. Tench, & L. Yeonmas (Eds.), Exploring public relations (2nd ed., pp. 117–146). Harlow, UK:PT Prentice Hall.
Vanc, A. M., & Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2016). Scope and status of public diplomacy research by public relations scholars, 1990–2014. Public Relations Review, 42(3), 432-440.
Vujnovic, M. & Kruckeberg, D. (2005). Imperative for an Arabmodel of public relations as a framework for diplomatic, corporate and nongovernmental organization relationships. Public Relations Review, 31, 338-343.
Wirth, L. (2001). Breaking through the glass ceiling; women in management. The International Labour Organisation (ILO) publications. Geneva.
Yun, S. H. (2006). Toward public relations theory-based study of public diplomacy: Testing the applicability of the excellence study. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(4), 287–312.
Zaharna, R. (1995). Understanding Cultural Preferences of Arab Communication Patterns. Public Relations Review, 21(3), 241-255.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2019 Layla Al Saqer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.